There are several rational reasons why they may not pursue legal action.
(1) Budgetary Concerns: Typically, people opt for LON surgery in Turkey to save money. Complications could increase their expenses beyond their means.
(2) Language and Geographical Barriers: Taking legal action against a medical institution in another country would likely be complex and burdensome.
(3) Privacy Concerns: Initiating a lawsuit might expose the fact that they underwent LL surgery, something they may prefer to keep private.
However, taking legal action is a good way to legitimately judge WBT, and hiring a lawyer through collaboration with other victims might also be a viable option to consider.
I partly agree with the rationality of these reasons.
1- Yes, filing a lawsuit will require some expense. However, this will not pose a big problem in the first stage. Because the sums to be obtained in such cases are high, and in this respect, lawyers will generally tend to cut costs by demanding a certain rate over the possible earnings when the case is won. Of course, this is valid when they see a light in the complainant's story.
2- It is clear that this will pose a problem to a certain extent. But this is not an insurmountable obstacle. Every country has law offices that are in active communication with law offices in other countries. Even if you are in a foreign country, it is possible to proceed through any law office in the country to be sued.
3- Such cases are cases where the attorney carries out all the processes on behalf of his client, and the identity of the client often remains a very small detail. His attorney receives the information from the client and fights with this information in court on his behalf. In most cases, the client does not even have to go to court. Therefore, the identity of the plaintiff cannot be known by most people except his lawyer and the court board.
Undoubtedly, an impartial third party - the courts - is the optimum solution when a dispute arises between the parties. Otherwise, each side will continue to argue that they are right in their own way, which will make it difficult to reach a conclusion. WBT has not disregarded any of its legal liabilities arising from contracts. In fact, although there is no legal obligation in terms of patient satisfaction, the company did not hesitate to make sacrifices in most cases. In this respect, WBT requested to apply to the judicial authorities for the problems encountered and encouraged the other party to do so. Wbt always prefers to settle accounts with the parties before the court rather than dealing with smear campaigns covered with unfounded allegations and slanders