Hi guys, I know I'm boring as this is the 2nd topic I've open in two days, but please don't judge me.
So, if you devide femur length with tibia lenght the optimal result should be 0.8. In my case I was often told i have short femurs but when i do the calculations it turns out to be false.
inseam: 82.5cm
tibia(measured from the floor to just below the knee cap): 45cm
femur: I just took these to measurements to get a femur length of 37.5 cm
Now when i devide it it comes out to 0.83, wich is optimal(I think people and me as well get the impression of short femurs cuz i carry a lot of mass in them).
If I should lengthen one segment what do you think is better, femur or tibia?
In case of femur lengthening(4cm):
37.5 + 4 = 41.5 making the ratio 0.92
In case of tibia lengthening(4cm)
45 + 4 = 49 making the ratio 0.77
So what do you think is better?
Measurements are:
height(morning) 181.6cm
(night) 179.5cm
wingspan 183-4cm
inseam and each leg segment length is evidented up in the post.
sitting height is about 97-98
my picture is here:
http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=769.0