If everybody (or "when" most people after LL race) is 6,0" or 6,2" would you still consider it an "ideal" height? That is not even for example the prefered height of women in the UK (it's less in "Badou"). WTF is an "ideal height" ?? And in which country? Isn't it "counter" genetically differently but still in all coutries??
Sometimes I don't understand what's your reasoning, guys. Why such an importance to being OVER tall, specially taking into account all the burdens of LL (risks, pain, time, money, etc.)? Before you ask me why I question this and why I am in the forum, I'll tell you: I'm allmost under 3 standard deviations below average and neurosis during decades led me to major depression.
Furthermore, being tall (not even "over tall") also brings higher risk of back pain, higher risk of cloting, average less life span, more problems in joints and other health issues.
I don't even mention a dozen of other non health examples of disadvantages like to have a relatively smaller penis and being more likely to have a shallow partner, less likely to loves us for our true inner self and not physical advantages.
Why not being satisfied with a little less, like average height or even 1 inche above it and work on other women appealing issues, like having our own paid house, a good prestigious well paid job, a post graduation, a nice car, being atentive to family, having languages knowledge, having travelled, having coaching, training interesting skills and hobbies, fashionable
dressing, know how to cook and speak about it...
I've had 3 girlfriends, all 3 cm taller than me, and only lost them because of height neurosis, not height itself nor because of them.
