Another question, guys, I would like to ask why I see that Paley‘s error rate is so low and even seems to be zero failure (the failure I said is to cause paralysis or death). For example, the incidence of bone nonunion is 0%. Did he use some effective methods to avoid these? Or is it just a matter of experience or coincidence
I think that paralysis or death are always a thing in every surgery .
Whatever surgery you see those complications are kinda common in the risk section even tho extremely rare and maybe never happened to best cosmetic surgeons in their career .
So to answear your question , I think that we have no way to know if those numbers are real or fake ,but I don't think he severally crippled any CLL patients (I say CLL because he makes controlled fractures there why in LL discrepancy patients it's harder to deal and fix them all I believe due to traumas etc. ).
Death its caused by embolisms in this surgery and he says he has a way to prevent them and treat them in case they happen and he probably does since the amount of LL he did/does and no death so far ( we would know about this in case it happened ).
About non-unions I don't thing he never had one,no way ,but I think he treated them successfully with bone grafts or bY reversing the precice nail (safety feature of the Nuvasive nail) meaning that yes non union might have happened but no major complication after them .
I think this is what 0% stand for ,but the way they put it out there sometimes its tricky if you don't carefully think .
This is my point of view tho