If proximal osteotomy was something the Precice nail would have issue with, then that's something the Nuvasive rep who was in the OR for Penguinn's surgery would have mentioned to Dr Parihar, but nothing was said. All devices have a likelihood of having a mechanical error, which is why faulty nails are covered at no cost to the patient. It's a stretch to belive a nail failed because of the osteotomy site as opposed to the mechanics of the nail itself.
Also, 3 surgeons =/= every doctor in the US, and even listing every doctor on this site wouldn't be a fraction of that, but there are many surgeons who prefer more proximal femur osteotomies
What exactly are you worried about regarding the area chosen for osteotomy anyway?
No idea why Ellipse representative didn't say anything. Maybe this is a newly discovered problem?
The concern is really just that
a) the nail might not respond because the osteotomy is proximal. I don't have any official documentation stating this but only anecdotes
b) if it was decision taken because of lack of equipment in the OR
To quote Ascending about his surgeon
I suspect that the reason Dr E chose to do a high osteotomy in my case was because my femur was curved and he did not have a flexible drill to hand during the surgery and so he took whatever steps he could to continue the surgery. I remember he told me after the surgery that it took 5 hours because he did not have a flexible drill for reaming which was needed because of femur curvature and so he had to go very slowly and carefully with the straight drill.
Then again, it's just strange that after going through 50 diaries I couldn't find one x-ray of such a proximal osteotomy. So I'm just looking for an explanation.