Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Are tibias really not to be touched?  (Read 648 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SartBimpson

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Are tibias really not to be touched?
« on: December 27, 2020, 05:40:34 PM »

Heard there's like a far higher risk of complication when you're working your tibias than there is when you're working on your femurs.

Is this true? And should lengthening really be limited to no more than 2 inches?
Logged

exceeding2meters

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 181
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2020, 05:49:25 PM »

I don't see why no tibias, and I don't see why 2 inches specifically

One person does LL for discrepancy reasons 4cm and develops arthritis, other person does LL for cosmetic reasons 10cm and is fine.

No matter what you read on the forums or what docs tell you, the only way is to take the plunge and find out

This is what I realise the more diaries I read
Logged
I tell you now, I am the one to survive
No one can stop my faith or my STRYDE!!

SartBimpson

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2020, 10:19:58 PM »

I don't see why no tibias, and I don't see why 2 inches specifically

One person does LL for discrepancy reasons 4cm and develops arthritis, other person does LL for cosmetic reasons 10cm and is fine.

No matter what you read on the forums or what docs tell you, the only way is to take the plunge and find out

This is what I realise the more diaries I read

fk, is it worth that risk though?
Logged

Sambollio

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 277
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2020, 02:35:46 AM »

This answer is going to suck but... I think only you could know that. I’d say, spend a ton of time researching, like more than a couple months, and then decide.
Logged

Body Builder

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1950
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2020, 02:46:48 AM »

Heard there's like a far higher risk of complication when you're working your tibias than there is when you're working on your femurs.


Is this true? And should lengthening really be limited to no more than 2 inches?
No.
External tibias is by far the safest way to do LL and most people could handle 6-6.5 cm without much problems.
Logged

exceeding2meters

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 181
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2020, 11:06:50 AM »

fk, is it worth that risk though?
Imo yes it is
Logged
I tell you now, I am the one to survive
No one can stop my faith or my STRYDE!!

SartBimpson

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2020, 03:06:41 PM »

No.
External tibias is by far the safest way to do LL and most people could handle 6-6.5 cm without much problems.
I see. Could you tell me how much you lengthened and which segments you've done, and also how you're feeling now?

Appreciate your input by the way BB.
Logged

MakeMeTallAF

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 126
Re: Are tibias really not to be touched?
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2020, 07:40:16 PM »

No.
External tibias is by far the safest way to do LL and most people could handle 6-6.5 cm without much problems.


Why do you say this?

Most docs seem to think Stryde Femurs is as safe as it gets for now. Tibias always have worse recovery as compared to femurs
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up