What other method do they use to make consolidation faster with LON? Does their new method also reduce the deep infection risk that comes with LON? Because with LATN the infection risk is a bit lower.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628243/
BMAC helps consolidation
Also alignment is very important for faster consolidation
There are a few cases of misalignment I’ve known from other doctor who does only unilateral.
The consolidation was very slow or even got non union case.
Then they went to Donghoon to do the other leg. Consolidation was much faster like twice as fast as the first misaligned legs
His aighment technique is superb. very meticulous adjustment he makes upon the completion of lengthening. Sometimes it takes a few weeks to adjust well with External frames
If slight knee contracture is present, alignment will not be good, so he waits till the slight knee contracture is overcomed by stretching
he doesn’t use regular frames as it is and modified LON frames to get better adjustment
Also they give lots food at hospital such as beef, chicken, pork, soy beans, milk, fish, shells etc..
Supplements aren’t really needed with their food
After seeing lots cases, I’m worried about the dent on the front side of the shins like yours and Jolien
They never have deep bone infections
So there’s no merit of doing LATN unless there’s severe deformity
The inputs from their site
—————-
However, there are some potential weaknesses of LATN. After the lengthening period, a correction period is added. Hence, an external fixator needs to be maintained for an additional 2-4 weeks, compared to LON. Also, one or two more external fixator pins are inserted than in LON. The LATN method was established by Dr. Rozbruch. (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18800209), Before he solved the disadvantages of conventional LON (valgus change and bone formation – this is explained in the LON section.), Dr. Donghoon Lee used LATN more than LON.
However, since he has now solved these two problems, he uses the LON method more often for general stature lengthening; it is simpler and less expensive than LATN. In some cases, such as small bone canals, short bone length, and when the intramedullary nail cannot be inserted because of severe deformation, LATN is still the best option. LATN is also very useful in treating many rare diseases that are otherwise difficult to cure.