Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which is healthy tibia or femur?  (Read 916 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

MrJames

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« on: June 21, 2019, 09:34:33 PM »

Hi,

have been asked before.

Which is healthy tibia or femur for lengthening surgery?

Healthy:
Distorting the anatomy of the body.
Walking, jogging etc. affecting movements.


For example, in some countries, tibia lengthening are 7-8 cm. How healthy is this?


Thanks.
Logged

Activatedx

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 242
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2019, 01:10:14 AM »

Hi,

have been asked before.

Which is healthy tibia or femur for lengthening surgery?

Healthy:
Distorting the anatomy of the body.
Walking, jogging etc. affecting movements.


For example, in some countries, tibia lengthening are 7-8 cm. How healthy is this?


Thanks.


Max for tibia is 5-6 cm, anything you read over that is fake or they’re lying. 5cm by itself is hard to achieve not everyone can do 6. Maximum for femurs is 8cm, that is the safe limit.

Femurs is much easier to lengthen than tibia, however there are not external methods for femurs.
Logged

MrJames

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2019, 08:14:03 AM »

Thanks.

I guess the doctors here don't care about your health.
They do 7-8 cm for Tibia. They say there's no problem if you ask.

Health doesn't matter, money matters.

I'm thinking femur. Internal nail. Max 7-8 cm.


The doctor must decide the lengthening. The patient should not decide.
The patient does not think about health, always wants more.
Logged

PANDA:BEAR..

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 240
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2019, 01:03:29 PM »

Thanks.

I guess the doctors here don't care about your health.
They do 7-8 cm for Tibia. They say there's no problem if you ask.

Health doesn't matter, money matters.

I'm thinking femur. Internal nail. Max 7-8 cm.




The doctor must decide the lengthening. The patient should not decide.
The patient does not think about health, always wants more.

I think some of the top doctors ... do care and have certain limits of lengthening
Panda  8)
Logged

MrJames

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2019, 07:20:54 AM »

That's true, but most doctors don't care.

What about femur or tibia for better health?
It's a negative effect on the body.
Logged

MrJames

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2019, 07:40:49 AM »

My x-ray.

How do you think the tibial and femur?

Which region is better for surgery? (tibia or femur)

For example, I made an 8cm lengthening from the femur.





Logged

Yannick

  • Visitor
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2019, 10:44:13 AM »

Femur conventionally tends to heal better, there isn't an additional bone to fix, like fibula next to tibia. Additional factor to condsider eg. is the proximity of the common peroneal nerve to the fibula neck, it can also be a risk factor of nerve injury (which usually isn't permanent).

Nowadays internal methods are the safer way, if the surgeon has enough skills (the bigger toolbelt of handling complications). The lack of expertise in tibia nailing (even Paley has less experience with tibia intramedullary approach, than femur), and the narrower anatomical canal/spaces make operation on tibia a more difficult area, with higher risk of tissue injury. 
Logged

MrJames

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
Re: Which is healthy tibia or femur?
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2019, 11:22:46 AM »

Femur conventionally tends to heal better, there isn't an additional bone to fix, like fibula next to tibia. Additional factor to condsider eg. is the proximity of the common peroneal nerve to the fibula neck, it can also be a risk factor of nerve injury (which usually isn't permanent).

Nowadays internal methods are the safer way, if the surgeon has enough skills (the bigger toolbelt of handling complications). The lack of expertise in tibia nailing (even Paley has less experience with tibia intramedullary approach, than femur), and the narrower anatomical canal/spaces make operation on tibia a more difficult area, with higher risk of tissue injury.


Thanks.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up