Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Different nails and infection rate  (Read 618 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

sylar94

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 117
Different nails and infection rate
« on: May 29, 2019, 10:19:17 PM »

Why do different nails have different infection rate?
Since the procedure is exactly the same, a nail is inserted in the bone, why does the LL method change the infection rate?
Infection rates: LON > LATN > Precise
Logged

Ghostfish

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 442
Re: Different nails and infection rate
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2019, 12:34:07 AM »

I am not so sure the exact infection rate. But I think it would be more likely this.
LON ~ LATN >>> Precise
Logged

Maison

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 223
Re: Different nails and infection rate
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2019, 01:39:49 AM »

Why do different nails have different infection rate?
Since the procedure is exactly the same, a nail is inserted in the bone, why does the LL method change the infection rate?
Infection rates: LON > LATN > Precise

LON and LATN have a risk for pinsite infection.
In LON, the position of the pins and the nail during the lengthening phase is close, so the risk of deep infection is high.

Therefore, the infection rate is in the following order.
LON > LATN > PRECICE
Logged

saad

  • Visitor
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6
Re: Different nails and infection rate
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2019, 08:28:44 PM »

what about  fitbone ?
Logged

otavio

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
Re: Different nails and infection rate
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2019, 08:56:25 PM »

The same as precise, fitbone has less weight bearing than precise and antenna( setback)
Logged

Ghostfish

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 442
Re: Different nails and infection rate
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2019, 05:28:49 AM »

what about  fitbone ?
External nails will be at risk for infection during the entire lengthening period which takes at least 3 months.  After lengthening, LON and LATN will remove frame and put some rod inside.  I know LON but no idea about LATN.  Anyway, after this moment until wounds are healed, you may have a risk for infection.  After wounds are healed, no infection will occur.  However, traditional illizarov doesn't remove the external frame, so you will be at risk for injection until the frames are off, which takes 10-12 months.

Internal devices, including every kind as long as they are completely inserted inside, have an infection rate only during after surgery until wounds are healed which takes 7-10 days.  In this case, infection rate is not depending on the type of device but depending on the doctor and hospital.  Sometimes, patient's careless behaviors such as shower, water dripping to wounds, or dirty environments may cause infection too.  I don't really consider some internal nails which have some sort of screws coming out of the bones.  In this case, you will still have high risk of injection during the entire lengthening period, perhaps at a little less extent to external method.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up