I've never read of anyone having done leg lengthening who went public using their real name, for example blogging about it, or talking to the press. Apotheosis was interviewed, but he remained pseudonymous.
I'm considering being public about my upcoming quadrilateral CLL (tibias+femurs) and perhaps running a fundraiser to help cover some of the costs ($180K is a lot!) - something like a GoFundMe campaign (like a Kickstarter for personal causes). I've spent a lot of time learning about CLL and I'd update backers with pre-op tips, how the recovery is going, what exercises have helped, supplements I took, useful gadgets to aid recovery, ways to combat pain (I have some novel ideas there) etc. What do others think about this? I could be pseudonymous but still show my face, or go fully public and use my real name.
I'm an entrepreneur and software engineer living in the San Francisco Bay Area, where there are many
transumanists - people who believe in the use of technology to improve human life. (We are all actually transhumanists, whether we are aware of it or not - do you wear an external thermoregulatory device or an optics enhancement one? You're a transhumanist. It's only a matter of degree between clothes and glasses to CLL.)
All my friends and acquaintances already know and 95% have been supportive. They've asked questions, offered to visit, help with stuff, places to stay etc. People I've told about it at gatherings and networking events around tech,
life extension, entrepreneurship or the like have been intrigued and supportive. The 5% who haven't been supportive wouldn't be good friends anyway, right?
Telling a larger audience WILL polarize people, but as our friend Dr. Seuss says, "
those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter". I don't care if I do an AMA and some randoms on reddit are anti-CLL. If I do a fundraiser, haters gonna hate but they won't steal my funds. If anything, controversial publicity is good publicity.
Employment-wise, HIPAA protects you from having to tell your boss, but I told my boss anyway and he was supportive too. Future employers might or might not Google me and find anything CLL related - I have a significant online presence related to my open source software work that will probably overshadow CLL.
Re. women - my partner has been super supportive and will live with me during the recovery period. Generally, you'll want to tell your (prospective) gf/wife at some point anyway. If she has a problem with that - huge red flag. For one-night stands, girls won't Google you (if they even learn your last name). So not a reason either.
I've asked about this in another thread and got only one reply.
Arguments against going public - 1.I agree with everything you've said, fivefive, but the thing about being public about CLL is how public you intend to make it, and how famous you are. If it's just to the people in your life, I don't see a problem. Like you said, everyone who can't at least show empathy can beat it. The main problem is that [...] sadly, there are a bunch of money hungry, bad doctors willing to perform CLL. If a famous person went public with CLL, there's bound to be a bunch of youngsters butchering themselves with doctors like those.
Fair point. I'm somewhat "famous" but not a lot. I've been in the startup world for a while and on TV a bit but I don't have a large online following or anything. To prevent others from getting scammed or butchered, I can emphasize how crucial it is to do your research, and to wait to get the necessary funds to do CLL
well, with the safest doctors you can afford.
Also, by the time those interested in CLL will be doing it, the very promising
PRECICE 3 / STRYDE will be available, which should considerably improve recovery and
maybe even lower the costs, and allow faster return to work, so the loss of income will be less of a factor.
Arguments against going public - 2.Another counter-argument - that patients don't want to post negative things about their recovery for fear of retaliation from the doctor. To prevent this, I plan to tell my doctor I'm going public. That should get him to be extra attentive
I'd be curious to learn about other counter-arguments.
I want to be taller for myself - to better my ability to relate with people. To see them at eye level. To increase my confidence. To not feel like I have to compensate for something I had no control over when I was born. Because now, I do have control.
Becoming taller gives you extra confidence, for sure. But do you want real confidence, beyond the physical aspect of CLL?
Own it. Tell people you took matters into your own hands, 𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒇𝒖𝒄𝒌 𝒐𝒇𝒇, and worked hard to become a taller person. Confidence comes from accomplishments. Every challenge we face, successful or not, is building our confidence. We only get one life. This is it. This is you.
Those who can't understand are showing a lack of empathy, and can sod off. One's drive to get the money and the courage to go through with this major surgery, show much more about their character than how long their legs happened to be in the genetic lottery.
I'm being anonymous for now by default, and because everyone here has been anonymous. However, it's not clear to me why I wouldn't want to go public. Give me some good reasons against being public about CLL.