What is exactly red pill about what he posted? That good looking guys get more attention from women on hook-up apps?
In other news, water is wet
No, don't even try to manipulate facts to support your view. What I posted clearly show that the attention distribution is focused on the top 20% and the 80% rest are almost completely ignored. The same 80/20 repeats in many other sxxual organisms like apes/elephants & so on. It's not that good looking guys get more attention from women. It's that ugly to average guys (80%) get low to no attention at all. You imply that a 8/10 man will get 8/10 attention and a 6/10 man will get a 6/10 attention, but reality is that 8/10 man will get 9/10 attention and a 6/10 man will get 1/10 attention.
Reality is different: bottom 80% of men compete for bottom 20% of women, while top 80% of women compete for top 20% of men which is rather different than what you're claiming.
The Pareto Principle is observable in many aspects of life and sxxual biology is one of them
My original point of view had the following logical scheme:
- female attraction is different than male attraction
this is how men rate women
and this is how women rate men
Remember all of this is not some creation from my mind but from several scientific studies and research.
Based on this presumption (that female attraction is different to male attraction), and that OP wants to appear more attractive to men then chances are she is doing it based on how a women would find a man attractive. I wanted to show the difference between the two and that her idea (+16 fking CM) may lead to a worse state
- I hoped to make OP understand that there's no need to be in top 20% of height for women, because male value attractiveness differently and not as selectively because Sperm is cheap ( a man can impregnate over 1000 women in 9 months) while Egg is expensive ( a woman after being impregnated by a man has to wait 9 months at least), makes sense then to select the very best. As such, since men aren't that selective there's not that big difference if any at all from a 5'0 girl to a 5'6 one give that they're equal in everything else.
2nd point
- Statistics show that women beauty & attractiveness coincides with youth & fertility. A woman's chance of having a child drops from 90% (early 20s) to 15-20% (at 34)
Therefore it comes to the logical conclusion if she wants to be more attractive to men than 16cm of height won't make her more attractive, chances are it will do the opposite (since it will age her faster)
However if OP as she claims, is doing it for herself cause she feels like a kid, then who am I to suggest her otherwise.
All my posts are towards helping OP making the best decision for her and that's it. I've supported all my claims with facts, so it shouldn't be hard for someone to notice it.