I don't think patients have the right to decide which doctor is more capable than the other. That is something only doctors can analyse about themselves, a peer review so to speak. That means that LL doctors are the ones who can understand the technical skills and deficiencies of one another.
However, experience is the most important asset for a surgeon much more than intelligence and that is directly linked to the number of cases they've had. Now I don't know if Dr. Parihar has only done 1-2 cases of LL, remember that cosmetic cases are not the only reason to do LL and also that not even close to 10% of patients that do have LL have a diary (except Monegal for marketing reasons haha).
Finally, please do not underestimate all Indian doctors, there are a lot of them who are very skilled, much more so than 1st world countries. I remember that during lengthening one of the patients had diarrhoea. You cannot imagine how wrong it was treated even at one of the most expensive clinics in Milan. Even a doctor in the far corner of the world with no meds and no test would have treated him better.
The environment in which the doctor operates is very important; however, do not think that more technology means the doctor is better. And for other users, do not think that just having the operation in a first world country means that you will be safe or that there is no malpractice or that doctors do not cover for each other. That is indeed naive.