Message from a member:
"hey there sibirsky
how are you doing with your progress?"
-I'm doing fine
thanks!
"Im looking for some words of advice,...
from reading here and there on this forum, i gather that the more popular or reasonable way to lenghten (if youre into getting it done in 1 surgery), is to do Femur lengthening.
I know you chose to do tibia.
thus I have few questions in mind -
1- This may be totally misperception of mine, but i feel like femur lenghtening is actually more complicated, its a bone deeper within tissues of the leg. and biomechanically speaking, it feels to me as if a change of this portion of the leg (femur) makes much more of a mess to the funcion of walking, running etc. again, im no orthopedic surgeon nor that anatomy expert, but thats my impression.
-why did u choose to do tibia?"
-2 reasons: It's (WAY!)cheaper(or way less painful in the case of external femurs) and using externals allow correction. Choosing internal femurs may not allow to have precise correction because we'd need a hexapod for that. However I do understand that for the knee joints is better to do femurs if you need hugher lengthening though I can't be absolutely sure about this. What i am absolutely sure about is that the ideal tibia:femur ratio is 0.8 and so for the best results one should measure ones legs via x-rays and only then see which limb would be the best to be lengthen so that there is the least deviation from this ratio. The tibias should best not exceed the size of the femurs post lengthening
"2- I just happen to see on Youtube a video of a kid underwent tibia lenghtening by dr. mahboubian, and his walking post op (few months) seems totally normal. to be honest that made me thrilled and totally made me rethink about tibia as an option..."
-Not to burst your bubble or anything but children's bones are very different from adults. Less weight bearing is needed and the bones are thinner and more malleable. Hence the time needed to wear ex-fix is much lesser. However it's not recommended kids use IM nail because it could injure growth plates so there's that..
3- "whats your take about surgeons who dont do this ll as cosmetic surgery routinely?
and about the 'less advanced' techniqes regarding this operation and its advantages / disadvantages...."
-So firstly we must first understand what counts as a limb deformity? It could be angulation (bow legs/knock knees) it could be translation issues, but most importantly in our case, a deformity can be a limb length discreapancy where one leg is longer than the other. So by default surgeons who specialise in this field are adequately trained on how to lengthen limbs and equalise them. The should be well-trained in carrying out osteotomies . But what differs in cosmetic cases is the amount that a patient wants to lengthened (which is not fixed unlike deformity cases where the lengths need equalising) and the ethical dilemma of it: is it morally correct to break a perfectly healthy persons legs in order to solely bring about a cosmetic benefit, perfectly knowing athletically the patient may not reach pre-surgery levels of fitness?
So in essence I think that an orthopaedic surgeon that is qualified in the aforementioned types of deformity correction procedures can commit to the patient and accept the consequences from a moral standpoint, it should be fine
As for technology...I can't really comment too much. From what I understand generally, more advanced=more expensive=more comfort + faster recovery
"Hope for your speedy recovery"
-Thanks man! All the best to you too