Bluebarbie could not do precice femurs, she wrote her femurs were too small even for precice which is thinner than Stryde
I don't know Bluebaribe. However, whether or not her femurs are too small for Precice nails, her tibias should be even smaller than her femurs. I am talking about size comparison here between tibias and femurs, ok?
Also we need to take into account that Stryde is fully weight bearing while Precice is not, meaning that Precice nails need more bone support to be safe, although they are still not full weight bearing. Patients with Precice nails still need to walk with walkers or crutches, which is good and necessary. However, since Precice nails are not full weight bearing, patients need super high cautions and their bones need to provide some support for Precice nails for the safety.
On the other hand, Stryde nails are full weight bearing even without bones support, meaning that bigger nails for Stryde can be used for the same size of bone as compared to Precice. I saw many patients who are quite small like 140-150cm for men and women patients. They had Stryde nails either in femurs or tibias. I would say quite positively that most of people should have big enough bones in their femurs and tibias for Stryde nails, unless they are extremely small or have some defects.