Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Down

Author Topic: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm  (Read 126454 times)

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #155 on: March 17, 2014, 09:45:58 PM »

I used to think that I could do 10 cm on my tibs, but after reading through the forums it's obvious that's asking for trouble,  plus no doctor should really even allow that. I'm already 5'7" and want to be 5'11". That's why im thinking do 5-6 on tibs and 5-4 on femurs. It seems also that externals are the way to go. Forget the nails. Sure frames for longer but at least you can save the knee.
Logged

thetallerman

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 67
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #156 on: March 17, 2014, 10:21:47 PM »

I used to think that I could do 10 cm on my tibs, but after reading through the forums it's obvious that's asking for trouble,  plus no doctor should really even allow that. I'm already 5'7" and want to be 5'11". That's why im thinking do 5-6 on tibs and 5-4 on femurs. It seems also that externals are the way to go. Forget the nails. Sure frames for longer but at least you can save the knee.

You have virtually the same mindset as me: do a safe amount of lengthening, save your knees from terrible pain, and do externals...I'm also 5'7 (170cm) and though I'd love to be 5'11, I don't know if I'd have the will to go through it twice. I think I could do 2 surgeries no problem, but it's the lengthening part and fear of incredible boredom and life flying by that makes me want to do this only once. I want to do this once and get to at the very minimum 5'9, and maybe 5'9.5 as that would be great to be the US average, and 5'10 if my body is feeling up to the challenge and I still look ok proportionally. And if were to get to 5'9.5 or 5'10 (which would be awesome) I would be satisfied enough as I've worn lifts at those heights and feel pretty average, I am able to attract women just fine, and I feel overall confident enough at those heights.
Logged
Current Height: 5'7 (~170cm)
Desired Height: 5'9.5 or 5'10
Wingspan: 179.7cm / 5'10.75

Average US Male Height: 176.5 / 5'9.5 (CDC report)

HK

  • Visitor
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #157 on: March 17, 2014, 10:37:45 PM »

I used to think that I could do 10 cm on my tibs, but after reading through the forums it's obvious that's asking for trouble,  plus no doctor should really even allow that. I'm already 5'7" and want to be 5'11". That's why im thinking do 5-6 on tibs and 5-4 on femurs. It seems also that externals are the way to go. Forget the nails. Sure frames for longer but at least you can save the knee.

Hey !
So, you're saying internal nails probably lead to permanent knee pain/issues ?
Logged

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #158 on: March 17, 2014, 11:09:30 PM »

Hey !
So, you're saying internal nails probably lead to permanent knee pain/issues ?

Tbh, I can't say for certain as I've never done it. I'm just using my own common sense. no nail through the kneecap in my mind seems like it'd save you from knee pains. I'm still doing as much research as I can as I won't be ready for at least a year financially for this.

Plus doing a smaller amount such as 5cm. I'm 5'7" and I don't want care to be 6ft. I'd be more than happy at 5'11". 4 inches split between two parts is more realistic than 3+ in one. Athletic ability is a HUGE factor. I need to be able  to perform at my current level
Logged

amatan

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 40
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #159 on: March 17, 2014, 11:14:26 PM »

I used to think that I could do 10 cm on my tibs, but after reading through the forums it's obvious that's asking for trouble,  plus no doctor should really even allow that. I'm already 5'7" and want to be 5'11". That's why im thinking do 5-6 on tibs and 5-4 on femurs. It seems also that externals are the way to go. Forget the nails. Sure frames for longer but at least you can save the knee.

This is exactly the case I am in, I recently just did 5.5 on femurs and I'm considering doing 4 cm on tibias in a few years and can't decide between using another internal (maybe the precice) and going with externals on tibias. If price isn't a factor, the precice for tibias if you are looking for a smaller gain such as 4-4.5 cm imo can't be beat.
Logged
Did internal femurs using the PRECICE2 with Dr. Donghoon Lee in South Korea on December 27th, 2013, went from 5'7.5" to 5'9.6".  Will probably end up doing tibias in about a year with Dr. Birkholtz to get to 5'11".

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #160 on: March 17, 2014, 11:17:49 PM »

This is exactly the case I am in, I recently just did 5.5 on femurs and I'm considering doing 4 cm on tibias in a few years and can't decide between using another internal (maybe the precice) and going with externals on tibias. If price isn't a factor, the precice for tibias if you are looking for a smaller gain such as 4-4.5 cm imo can't be beat.

What was your experience like? How are you doing?  Do you have a diary? 
Logged

KiloKAHN

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2299
  • Digital Devil
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #161 on: March 17, 2014, 11:31:00 PM »

Hey !
So, you're saying internal nails probably lead to permanent knee pain/issues ?

There are studies showing that inserting a rod into the tibia has lead to persistent knee pain even after rod removal. Depending on the study you will see a different percentage, but there was one showing as high as 70% had that issue.
Logged
Initial height: 164 cm / ~5'5" (Surgery on 6/25/2014)
Current height: 170 cm / 5'7" (Frames removed 6/29/2015)
External Tibia lengthening performed by Dr Mangal Parihar in Mumbai, India.
My Cosmetic Leg Lengthening Experience

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #162 on: March 17, 2014, 11:34:56 PM »

Hey Kilo,

Have you done any LL or are considering?  Would you do externals only?
Logged

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #163 on: March 17, 2014, 11:40:41 PM »

Personally for me, LON/LATN isn't even an option..even in my femurs, I wouldn't do nails, only externals for a 5cm gain. If people/results show external femurs for even small gains are a bad idea, then oh well, looks like I'll have to be happy with 5cm on my tibias.
Logged

KiloKAHN

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2299
  • Digital Devil
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #164 on: March 17, 2014, 11:42:52 PM »

Hey Kilo,

Have you done any LL or are considering?  Would you do externals only?

Will start lengthening this April. I'm not going to do externals. I'd prefer to do plate fixation.
Logged
Initial height: 164 cm / ~5'5" (Surgery on 6/25/2014)
Current height: 170 cm / 5'7" (Frames removed 6/29/2015)
External Tibia lengthening performed by Dr Mangal Parihar in Mumbai, India.
My Cosmetic Leg Lengthening Experience

amatan

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 40
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #165 on: March 17, 2014, 11:51:00 PM »

What was your experience like? How are you doing?  Do you have a diary?

Pretty bad compared to other precice patients, but I did achieve my goal in the end so I can't complain too much.

Pretty good right now.  I should be able to stand by the end of the month or early april. 

Yes, I have a diary, I did the procedure with Dr. Donghoon Lee in south Korea.  To sum it up, my right leg was not lengthening properly from the start (Dr. Lee thinks this was due to my incredibly fast bone callus formation in the right leg), I wasn't getting enough from each lengthening.  At about 4 cm the device stopped lengthening completely and they had to do a second surgery and rebreak the bone.  Afterwards, the device still didn't lengthen properly, but I was getting enough from each lengthening that I was able to hit my target of 5.4-5.5 cm eventually, putting me at 176.5 cm.  It was fairly comfortable 99% of the time with the exception of a few moments that were incredibly painful.   

Logged
Did internal femurs using the PRECICE2 with Dr. Donghoon Lee in South Korea on December 27th, 2013, went from 5'7.5" to 5'9.6".  Will probably end up doing tibias in about a year with Dr. Birkholtz to get to 5'11".

mediocre

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 353
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #166 on: March 18, 2014, 12:42:48 AM »

Hi Amatan.

Congrats for achieving your goal although, lots of hiccups there.

The answer may be obvious but still I want to know your general experience on LL. Would you recommend precice? Wound you recommend Dr Donghoon Lee?

Thanks.
Logged

amatan

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 40
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #167 on: March 18, 2014, 01:46:58 AM »

Hard to say so far, but based on patients I met who have done 6 or less cm lengthenings here (most Koreans are very conservative in how much they lengthen in comparison to Westerners, very rarely does anyone lengthen over 6.5cm here), they say they've regained all or pretty close to their previous athletic ability, although I have noticed that the femur patients  as a whole recovered better than the tibia patients.  One patient here who did 6 cm on tibias say his sprint speed for a certain distance I don't remember went from 12.0 seconds to 12.8 after two years post surgery, which I consider a pretty good recovery. Talking to a lot the patients made one trend stick out to me - stick to 6 cm or less if you want to recover very close to your pre-op athletic level.  This is the main reason I decided to stick in the 5-6 cm range rather than go for my original target of 7.5 cm. 

I believe the two cases of precice malfunctions here were more or less freak isolated incidents.  Looking back on it objectively, I would still recommend the precice, the only disadvantage it has is that most doctors do not let you weight bear with it.

Dr. Lee is probably one of the best surgeons in the world for LL.  It's something I've heard a lot of surgeons here say, and he is regarded as possibly the top orthopedic surgeon in the whole of South Korea in LL and deformity correction.  Dr. Paley himself even said that he could not have done a better job with the surgery than Dr. Lee did when he was observing him.     

Logged
Did internal femurs using the PRECICE2 with Dr. Donghoon Lee in South Korea on December 27th, 2013, went from 5'7.5" to 5'9.6".  Will probably end up doing tibias in about a year with Dr. Birkholtz to get to 5'11".

ChrisIsaak

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 475
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #168 on: March 18, 2014, 04:40:42 AM »

Looking back on it objectively, I would still recommend the precice, the only disadvantage it has is that most doctors do not let you weight bear with it.   

Thanks for sharing this. I have observed the same thing with Turkish doctors, they are usually conservative and don't allow you to bear weight with Precice, even though it's technically possible. May I ask what level of weightbearing are you referring to? Were you on a wheelchair like me during your lengthening phase, or were you able to use crutches, at least for making transfers? Wish you a quick recovery.
Logged

shawty

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #169 on: March 18, 2014, 01:30:29 PM »

Does anyone have any experience or information on external femur lengthening for 4-6cm gains
Logged

sadboy

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 250
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #170 on: March 18, 2014, 07:30:51 PM »

Reading this forum made me realize that it is actually better to lengthen 5cm on the femurs or at least 5.5cm. On the other hand there is a chance that people might not be satisfied.

If anyone could please help me and answer me this question. Are there people who lengthened on Dr. Guichet and have any complications with how much they lengthened?
Logged

KiloKAHN

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2299
  • Digital Devil
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #171 on: March 18, 2014, 07:52:05 PM »

5 cm may seem insignificant just by looking at the number, but a 2 inch height gain makes a whole world of difference in actuality, especially if you're shorter to begin with.
Logged
Initial height: 164 cm / ~5'5" (Surgery on 6/25/2014)
Current height: 170 cm / 5'7" (Frames removed 6/29/2015)
External Tibia lengthening performed by Dr Mangal Parihar in Mumbai, India.
My Cosmetic Leg Lengthening Experience

sadboy

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 250
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #172 on: March 18, 2014, 09:07:27 PM »

5 cm may seem insignificant just by looking at the number, but a 2 inch height gain makes a whole world of difference in actuality, especially if you're shorter to begin with.

I agree with you, but most people would say that doing such a surgery for 5 cm is not worth it
Logged

Blackhawk

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 405
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #173 on: March 18, 2014, 11:58:58 PM »

At first I was planning on doing 7 but I don't think the potential complications are worth it.  I plan on doing 5-5.5.  Also I think 7 would make my tibs way too long.  Guys with tibs about 7 cms longer than mine are about 6' tall and I am about 5'6" right now.  I think that 5 cms makes a huge difference for most people.
Logged

Smallguy

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 425
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #174 on: March 19, 2014, 12:35:04 AM »

I agree with you, but most people would say that doing such a surgery for 5 cm is not worth it

Hey sadboy,

Just read your message. My surgery was screw up but I can walk/run. You can check my video from my diary.

My orthopaedic said the work that was done to my legs were actually an insult. The plates were all bent to begin with. My knee axis are way off causing x-leg or knock knee as they call it here. I was luckly to have no pain and to be able to walk/run again. But having x-leg kind of make it arkward to run with. I would need to wait another year for Canada to operate on me again. They will fix my x-legs and bent plate. My ortho will break one leg at a time and align it back straight again.

My dream for +6 femur in early 2015 has to be postpone now. I wonder what I will do with all the money I save up.
Logged
I live in the American Gardens Building on W. 81st Street on the 11th floor. My name is Patrick Bateman. I'm 27 years old. I believe in taking care of myself and a balanced diet and rigorous exercise routine.

rickybobby

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 51
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #175 on: March 19, 2014, 12:36:23 AM »

to me 5 cm is not worth it, if I am going to spend close to 100K USD i better get ATLEAST 3cm or i will just wear lifts my whole life!
Logged

Disobedient

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 410
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #176 on: March 19, 2014, 07:49:08 AM »

There are studies showing that inserting a rod into the tibia has lead to persistent knee pain even after rod removal. Depending on the study you will see a different percentage, but there was one showing as high as 70% had that issue.

how about the femur? I'm considering doing internal road in femur.. don't decided the doctor yet.. but yeah I do think of the internal sometime, and maybe I'll add 3-4cm more to my femur.. ..  but I don't want to damage my knee,! ..
seeing ppl who did LON/LATN I think they're doing fine like smallguy and others however, Sweden in the other hand has a lot of problems ..
Logged

BullSurfer

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 115
  • Let's jazz this up!
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #177 on: March 19, 2014, 08:19:02 AM »

I think if you don't do too much like 8 or 9 cm you should be ok.

Just to be safe, doesn't matter which method, lengthen 5 to 6 cm max.
Logged

Moubgf

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 507
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #178 on: March 19, 2014, 04:14:37 PM »

nah, waste of money to only lengthen 5 cm, the increase will be so little that you could have not done the surgery at all.

7-7.5 or Don't do it at all.
Logged

amatan

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 40
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #179 on: March 20, 2014, 03:43:59 AM »

nah, waste of money to only lengthen 5 cm, the increase will be so little that you could have not done the surgery at all.

7-7.5 or Don't do it at all.

So doing 5 cm is almost nothing, but 45-50% more than nothing is huge.

Makes sense. 
Logged
Did internal femurs using the PRECICE2 with Dr. Donghoon Lee in South Korea on December 27th, 2013, went from 5'7.5" to 5'9.6".  Will probably end up doing tibias in about a year with Dr. Birkholtz to get to 5'11".

ChrisIsaak

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 475
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #180 on: March 20, 2014, 04:07:06 AM »

Even 5 cm makes a significant difference on your legs' appearance. Being bedridden for two months, one thing I did for fun was keeping a ruler by my side at all times. I would place the ruler vertically to the ground and imagine standing on a box at 5 cm, 6 cm, 7 etc. on my former height to imagine how the difference would be.
Logged

amatan

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 40
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #181 on: March 20, 2014, 04:32:05 AM »

Thanks for sharing this. I have observed the same thing with Turkish doctors, they are usually conservative and don't allow you to bear weight with Precice, even though it's technically possible. May I ask what level of weightbearing are you referring to? Were you on a wheelchair like me during your lengthening phase, or were you able to use crutches, at least for making transfers? Wish you a quick recovery.

By the end of the month, full weightbearing (standing without crutches, taking first steps) should happen for me.

During lengthening and right now I am exactly like you are, on a wheelchair almost all the time. Dr. Lee only recently cleared me to stand with a walker and walk in place.  I can't stand totally normally yet (I still have a bit of duck ass) but it felt amazing.  Even though my eye level is only 3-3.5 cm taller than before (the rest will come as my back straightens), it is a huge difference in your perspective.   
Logged
Did internal femurs using the PRECICE2 with Dr. Donghoon Lee in South Korea on December 27th, 2013, went from 5'7.5" to 5'9.6".  Will probably end up doing tibias in about a year with Dr. Birkholtz to get to 5'11".

sadboy

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 250
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #182 on: March 20, 2014, 07:07:14 PM »

Hey sadboy,

Just read your message. My surgery was screw up but I can walk/run. You can check my video from my diary.

My orthopaedic said the work that was done to my legs were actually an insult. The plates were all bent to begin with. My knee axis are way off causing x-leg or knock knee as they call it here. I was luckly to have no pain and to be able to walk/run again. But having x-leg kind of make it arkward to run with. I would need to wait another year for Canada to operate on me again. They will fix my x-legs and bent plate. My ortho will break one leg at a time and align it back straight again.

My dream for +6 femur in early 2015 has to be postpone now. I wonder what I will do with all the money I save up.

Thanks for replying and I'm so sorry to hear that your surgery was a screw up, after all this surgery isn't easy. Do you think 7 cm on the femurs will be ok and safe?
Logged

ForcedPuberty

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 513
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #183 on: November 15, 2014, 07:47:46 PM »

Quote
Hard to say so far, but based on patients I met who have done 6 or less cm lengthenings here (most Koreans are very conservative in how much they lengthen in comparison to Westerners, very rarely does anyone lengthen over 6.5cm here), they say they've regained all or pretty close to their previous athletic ability, although I have noticed that the femur patients  as a whole recovered better than the tibia patients.  One patient here who did 6 cm on tibias say his sprint speed for a certain distance I don't remember went from 12.0 seconds to 12.8 after two years post surgery, which I consider a pretty good recovery. Talking to a lot the patients made one trend stick out to me - stick to 6 cm or less if you want to recover very close to your pre-op athletic level.  This is the main reason I decided to stick in the 5-6 cm range rather than go for my original target of 7.5 cm.

4-6cm is the safe zone for athletic function. only go beyond that 4-6cm range if you think that the extra height is worth having, in exchange for an athletic function of 60-70% your current level.

your daily life function becomes affected at a higher cm level than this safe zone.
Quote
those who chose to lengthen between 6 and 7 centimeters recovered 100% in performing daily functions, BUT only recovered about 60-70% of their pre-LL athleticism when engaging in serious sports/strenuous activities

and above 7cm is an even greater decrease in function.

it is almost like after 5cm each additional cm is a new level of impairment. of course their are exceptions to the rule.



Logged
Nope, 20cm is just nope.

"because FP's the hero LL Forum deserves, but not the one is needs right now. So we'll hunt him, because he can take it. because hes not the hero. He's a silent gardian, watchfull protector. The Dark Knight."

ReadRothbard

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1735
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #184 on: November 15, 2014, 08:03:35 PM »

I would disagree that 5cm on the femurs and/or tibias is necessarily the limit. I would go with what Dr. Paley says: 7 cm (or maybe slightly more) on the tibias and 8 cm on the femurs. 
Logged
“If you're afraid - don't do it, - if you're doing it - don't be afraid!” ― Genghis Khan

172 cm in the morning (67.8"); 170 cm (67”) at night; Sitting Height: 96 cm (37.8”); Goal: 184.5 cm (6'0.7"); Ultimate Goal: 192 cm (6’3.5) morning height, 190 cm (6’3) “night” height
Future space tycoon

ForcedPuberty

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 513
Re: The new paradigm in LL; no longer are we aiming for 10cm
« Reply #185 on: November 15, 2014, 08:08:58 PM »

ok. I look forward to your diary proving this claim. I hope you don't end up like Sweden RR.

I will pray for you. :)
Logged
Nope, 20cm is just nope.

"because FP's the hero LL Forum deserves, but not the one is needs right now. So we'll hunt him, because he can take it. because hes not the hero. He's a silent gardian, watchfull protector. The Dark Knight."
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Up