Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: LON  (Read 2448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Revenge

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 79
LON
« on: October 12, 2015, 08:59:15 PM »

İs enfection  huge risk at all?
ilizarov or Lon is better about infection why ?
Logged

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: LON
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2015, 09:35:16 PM »

Infection is a risk, but not a huge risk.  Internals have a very small risk of a deep bone infection, while externals have a bigger risk of minor pinsite infections.

With LON you have all the risk factors of both external and internal methods, so external-only Ilizarov is better in terms of avoiding infection.
Logged

Revenge

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 79
Re: LON
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2015, 09:45:50 PM »

I dont know why but ilizarov scared me like a hell Lon doesnt look so horrible
Logged

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: LON
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2015, 09:47:29 PM »

I dont know why but ilizarov scared me like a hell Lon doesnt look so horrible

You can do LON with Ilizarov frames.  The two aren't mutually exclusive.  I think you need to research the terminology.  Read this:

http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=95.0
Logged

Deepak Chopra

  • Newbi
  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 71
Re: LON
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2015, 11:40:01 PM »

Internals are best all the way but next best thing is LON because it is partly internal and ads stableness to your legs that you do not have with external.
Logged
I've got to do what I've got to do.
Pages: [1]   Go Up