problem is , my local surgeon saw my latest x-rays where there was speed-up in consolidation due to my slower lengthening rate (in part)... he says I should do at least 0.5/0.75 alternately. 0.5 might be risky.
dr fahri however, who did my operation, saw my outdated x-rays (2 weeks earlier) because I didn't request for a soft copy of the latest x-ray from the hospital. based on dr fahri's reading of the slightly-outdated X-rays, he says: do 0.5.
dr fahri strongly believes I should do 0.5. He says the ideal lengthening rate is 0.66mm.day. he allows me to do 0,75 and 0.5 altnerately but says, 0.5 is better.
dr bagirov however, did not prefer 0.5, or 0.5/0.75. he seems to think both are equally fine.
the curious thing about my frames, are that theoretically 3 turns = 0.75. IN TRUTH, however, each time I turn 0.75, the device probably turns less. why? my excel spreadsheet is always 5 mm ahead! this means the actual gain in length is LESS.
if you actually listen to your body (and I do, turning slower or faster depending on pain), then you WILL FIND that your actual lengthening rate averages (at least in my case it did) at about 0.66 mm/day.
my worry is that a theoretical 0.5 mm/day on paper is actually like 0.4mm/day, might end up with premature consolidation
then again, I must say it is insane to do 0.75mm./day once your soft tissues are stretched out. I did that rate for 5 days and my archilles and knee got much worse. I slowed to 0.5 for one week, and everything recovered.
0.5/0.75 is manageable so I might do that. if I encounter severe soft tissue issues, I will have to discuss more seriously with both surgeons whether 0.5 would be fine.
Im very happy that I have already gained 4.5 cm. If I prematurely consolidate at 5-6 cm, I have no intention to go back to the surgery room.