Greetings Dr Birkholtz. Primarily, I'd like to thanks your contributions to this thread in shedding light on certain hazy issues found within the limb lengthening world. It is refreshing to see a weighted opinion from a professional. If you may, would you please answer the following queries -
1) Is the placement of the break relevant in regards to recovery or even the look of the soft tissue surrounding it? For example, if one was to break and lengthen the center of the calf muscle vs just above the ankle.
2) I have noticed many issues with gait are often blamed on soft tissue. While this is an issue, I often think that minor misalignment may factor strongly into this, especially when viewing video footage where genu valgum (which I assume is different when the bone misaligns than simply being 'knock kneed') is present to some degree. Do you believe this is possible? Can genu valgum be corrected in its entirety an osteotomy or a 'guiding plate'? Can it be avoided in the current form of leg lengthening?
3) Soft tissue is one of the largest issues in regards to limb lengthening. Is there a medical consensus on why soft tissue doesn't adapt the same way it does during natural bone growth? We are all aware that after growth plates fuse no more growth can occur even under the same hormonal conditions but why does the same issue of growth of soft tissue occur where they technically have no 'end point' similar to plate fusion? Could one not accurately reproduce the hormonal conditions in soft tissue growth to mimic that found in natural growth? I believe I have read some studies that refer to issues with cell reproduction of soft tissue in regards to this.
4) A second question regarding soft tissue, after leg lengthening, does the body ever truly recover to the stretching even several years after combined with consistent physical therapy (if lengthened to reasonable standards rather than over lengthening leading to plastic deformation which I assume is permanent), creating new tissue as found in someone with legs of that natural length or does the body just adapt and become more flexible rather than truly recovering, with the soft tissue always being stretched to accommodate the new bone?
5) What are your thoughts on maintaining the ratio naturally found prior to leg lengthening? For example, lengthening both segments by 10% meaning they maintain the ratio or is falling in a biomechanically sound ratio just as acceptable?
6) Is there truly such thing as 100% recovery in regards to cosmetic leg lengthening when the soft tissue is stretched any amount reasonable or not or will it always limit maximum athletic potential even if its imperceptible?
7) What do you believe is the future of cosmetic leg lengthening? Personally, statistical evidence and measurements of patients would be the most important at this point. If I were to go forward with this surgery, I'd hope to do so in a decades time which by then I hope there have been improvements, with as much knowledge as possible and with a reputable surgeon such as yourself.
Thank you in advance for taking the time to read and hopefully reply to these questions. Regards.