Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ReadRothbard]

I'm a man same as you so I know where you're coming from but check this out:

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c350/mudhutwarrior/denise-milani-blue-bikini-balcony-p.jpg

This is a link to a model with unnaturally large breasts. Like a 6'4 man their size is more of a evolutionary disadvantage but still few men could honestly say they don't look sexy as hell. Just looking at them will release dopamine hormone to your brain and trigger an increase in heart rate and blood flow. When you get sufficiently aroused you will disregard almost anything in order to mate with her just because her large breasts is a sign of high estrogen levels, like a peacks colourful feathers is a sign of abundant nutrition.

Before you brand womankind "brainless" and "weak-minded" take a moment and try to be a little self-concious. We're all slave to biology it doesn't make us weak. Please, the internet doesn't need more misogony.

That is different. Attraction to big breasts is biological ; the height preference is not. The height preference is a societal construct; therefore, the same biochemical, evolutionary mehanisms of dopamine release, etc. are not at play. Besides, a woman can still be considered crazy hot even if she has very small breasts. A man while not be considered mainstream physically attractive if he is short.

I've heard evey argument in the book, my friend. There is really nothing you can say that I hasn't already thouroughly discredited.

[GROWtalORdieTRYING1]

The height preference is a societal construct

height is a genetic evolutionary trait. it is a biological construct. you can only argue that it is exacerbated by society's social/psychological engineering. you can not say it is created by society's social/psychological engineering.

[endomorphisme]

lol, 184 cm is not short polycrates, that's above average, and if you're 184 cm in the morning, you're 182-182.5 cm at night, so stop claiming 184 cm, it's not your real height.
At worst 184 cm is average...in the netherldands.

[TRS]

A man while not be considered mainstream physically attractive if he is short.

Are you sure? Think about Tom Cruise, Justin Beiber, Zac Efron, Taylor Laughtner, most members of one direction, Bruno Mars, Prince.
They are all below 175cm and their attractiveness have won the hearts of many females (even some males lol).
If height determined whether a guy is attractive then there would no such thing as Beiber fever or ladies labelling themselves as Directioners.

[ReadRothbard]

height is a genetic evolutionary trait. it is a biological construct. you can only argue that it is exacerbated by society's social/psychological engineering. you can not say it is created by society's social/psychological engineering.

There has never been any evidence to suggest that the height preference is biological; it is not universally considered an attractive trait.

[ReadRothbard]

They are good at hiding their heights. If women saw them in person, women would likely feel differently.

[Polycrates.]

lol, 184 cm is not short polycrates, that's above average, and if you're 184 cm in the morning, you're 182-182.5 cm at night, so stop claiming 184 cm, it's not your real height.
At worst 184 cm is average...in the netherldands.

Fair enough. I'll get stadiometered for exact measurements.