Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years  (Read 487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ramaka

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 297

Like the question says lol just a curious question to actually see if anyone actually knows how much ll has changed since it became more popular I.e. would it be more beneficial to do LL now or is it basically the same as then.
Logged

Body Builder

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1950
Re: How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2018, 02:15:01 AM »

Stryde changed everything.
A fully weight bearing magnetic internal nail is simply the most revolutionary and easy way to do LL.
So yes, the technology changed a lot. But not the last 10 years. The last few months!
Logged

ramaka

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 297
Re: How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2018, 02:58:58 AM »

Stryde changed everything.
A fully weight bearing magnetic internal nail is simply the most revolutionary and easy way to do LL.
So yes, the technology changed a lot. But not the last 10 years. The last few months!

Has it only been a few months since it’s been out honestly didn’t expect that.
Logged

Dirona

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 273
Re: How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2018, 06:16:59 AM »

Yes..Stryde is great in that recovery process is much better..But the question is are there methodologies that have been developed to prevent any risks/complications or does it remain the same?
Logged
Taking it easy

ramaka

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 297
Re: How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2018, 10:08:58 AM »

Yes..Stryde is great in that recovery process is much better..But the question is are there methodologies that have been developed to prevent any risks/complications or does it remain the same?

That’s what I wanted to say so but didn’t know how to word it so thanks 😂😂
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up