Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: LON vs LATN  (Read 1496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

doomsday

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 376
LON vs LATN
« on: March 08, 2017, 03:44:41 AM »
Very informative article about LON and LATN. You can clearly see why Russians and reluctant about LON and Indians do it all the time.
http://www.drdonghoon.com/index.php/archives/2414?ckattempt=1
Logged

TheLichKing

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 138
Re: LON vs LATN
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2017, 11:16:04 PM »
I posted this very same link in another thread. Indeed it is a very informative article. The majority of doctors, as far as I know, support LON; of course I could be wrong.
Logged
"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful." -Eric Thomas

Current height - 168.5 cm: 5'6.5
Goal - 180 cm: 5'11
*2 segments (femurs-6.5 cm) + (tibia-5 cm)=11.5 cm: 4.5''

doomsday

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 376
Re: LON vs LATN
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2017, 12:52:37 AM »
If you gonna look through  both forums you will notice that vast majority of LON procedures happen in China or India. There is as reason why Parihar, most Russians docs, Pili etc use mainly Externals without rods.
Logged

myloginacct

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 968
Re: LON vs LATN
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2017, 06:17:49 PM »
So LATN over LON?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »