Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: I have finally decided to go through with LL at the end of this year. Need help.  (Read 5606 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheLichKing

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 138

why not also consider Parihar for Internals? And yes, go for internal femurs first since they allow you to gain a greater height of 1-2 cm than tibia lengthening and are less invasive plus recovery is better. Both Parihar and Birkholtz are great choices for femur lengthening.
Logged
"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you'll be successful." -Eric Thomas

Current height - 168.5 cm: 5'6.5
Goal - 180 cm: 5'11
*2 segments (femurs-6.5 cm) + (tibia-5 cm)=11.5 cm: 4.5''

yyes

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 163

why not also consider Parihar for Internals? And yes, go for internal femurs first since they allow you to gain a greater height of 1-2 cm than tibia lengthening and are less invasive plus recovery is better. Both Parihar and Birkholtz are great choices for femur lengthening.

They both are talked about positively here. However, I don't know of any patients that have gone to them. Actually for parihar yes but Birkholtz I couldn't find any diaries :/
Logged

The Kaiser

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 656

Because kaiser is a guichet fanboy, nothing new here.

Go birkholtz for femurs or catagni for tibias.

I would never go to monegal since he prefers to use fitbone for CLL without any weight bearing which is an absolute joke if you are considering breaking both of your legs.

Yes i admit am Paley, Guichet and Rozbruch fanboy. Why? because they're the best in the field
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up