Hello,
I'm considering doing external tibia without LON/LATN for at least 6.5 cm of lengthening. My budget is limited so my only options are either go with Kulesh or Bagirov route.
To me, apart from height gain, post lengthening bone alignment is very important for final aesthetic results. I want to go to the beach and pool with confidence showing off my legs.
My concerns regarding Bagirov is that he uses modified Ilizarov frames that are compact in size but looks less sturdy and also he doesn't look after his patients during the distraction phase so if I mess up the alignment of tibia/fibula bones during the lengthening I might end up having bent or unequal legs which is unacceptable to me.
As far as I know Kulesh uses traditional Ilizarov frames and after the distraction phase he applies hexapod like device to accurately correct any misalignment made during the lengthening phase. Also, he seems to be more responsive and helpful for his patients as long as they remain in the city he operates in.
I could save more money in about 5 years from now in order to go and get it done in Greece or Italy but I can't bear my short stature any longer as I'm 29 years old already.
Bagirov quoted me exactly half the costs for pure external compared with what Kulesh charges. I can get it done in about a year with him but I might need another year of savings in order to get it done with Kulesh.
My questions is:
Should I get it done with Bagirov and lengthen in Baku? His price is very appealing to me because if I work harder and save the money aggressively, I can get it done in less than a year. Also, staying in Baku is relatively cheaper compared to staying in St. Petersburg.
If I go with Kulesh, not only will it cost me double for the surgery alone, but also living in St. Petersburg for about 4 months will cost me double too. Also, Russia seems relatively unsafe because of war thing going on to this date.
Given all these circumstances, what do you suggest is the most appropriate decision for me?
Thanks.