Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin  (Read 984 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lelouche

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« on: January 28, 2020, 04:48:36 AM »
Are you of the opinion that fully external lengthening is better in terms of comlications than LON method? (femur aswell as tibias).

External: - longer time in external device
Logged

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2020, 04:51:35 AM »
Yeah.  Less invasiveness is better.
Logged

lelouche

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2020, 10:14:31 PM »
It didnt post my whole text somehow, so i repost now.

External: - longer time in the device -> more infections
              + can fix bow bones more easy

LON Method: - loss of bone narrow (is that even bad?)
                    - harder to fix bow bones
                    - more risks liek fat ebolism (which is deadly!)
                     - second surgery is required
                      - possible permanent knee pain
                     + less time in frame and less time for consolidation because of the IM nail supporting the leg
                     
Logged

Moncx

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2020, 10:40:42 PM »
With pure external misalignement is comun risk
Logged

Skyisthelimit

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 184
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2020, 09:29:33 PM »
Bone marrow* regenerates. Yes, it would be very very bad to permanently lose the bone marrow since it’s the place where blood cells are produced.
Logged

TemakiSushi

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 460
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2020, 12:38:55 AM »
Tibias don’t have blood reproduction cells
Young femurs like 25 years old or less, yes
Logged
Plan to have Stryde TIBIAS surgery with Donghoon
Welcome any NEGATIVE information of Donghoon
Any doctor with more than 5% complication rate is NOT acceptable

lelouche

  • Newbie
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2020, 01:26:05 AM »
yes im 19 years old. But I think these cells will come back again
Logged

Rei

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 200
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2020, 04:14:23 PM »
Quote from: Moncx on January 30, 2020, 10:40:42 PM
With pure external misalignement is comun risk

? Is the only method where your doctor can fix literally everything everytime there is the need to
Logged

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: bigger risk with LON or with full External Lengthenin
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2020, 02:41:42 AM »
Quote from: Rei on February 16, 2020, 04:14:23 PM
? Is the only method where your doctor can fix literally everything everytime there is the need to

True, but some doctors aren't very good, so the nail in there acually helps keep the leg from getting too crooked. :o
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »