Hey all,
Quick update on me, I'm booked in with Dr Giotikas to do STRYDE femurs at the start of next year. I had my final consultation last weekend and underwent a proportion analysis. Doctor G has conducted an in-depth study of over 4500 men to work out tibia / femur ratios.
Using x-rays the doctor measures the femur and the tibia (tibia to floor) to give a ratio, according to his research the normal man would have a ratio of 1.20 (tibia to femur). My results showed my ratio was 1.14 meaning my femurs are already marginally longer in proportion to my tibias.
My measurements were as follows:Femur - 416mm
Tibia (to floor) - 474mm
Proportion analysis: 474/416 = 1.14
The analysis then looks at the ratio after lengthening (so adding 5.5cm to femur), this can this be turned into a number that represents standard deviations away from the mean (1.20). The analysis showed that after lengthening I would be around 3 standard deviations away from the mean, meaning only 1 in 500 people in the general population would have the same proportions as me naturally.
For me proportions are a
BIG deal so it leaves me in a slight dilemma, I could do tibias instead but really don't want to go down this road due to added complications or I just ignore the analysis and still go with femurs.
please see links below with images of my legs currently, any input / advise would be greatly appreciated.
https://imgur.com/a/j3d3AdmThanks
RG