Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: LON Vs. LATN  (Read 1559 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bohemia

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
LON Vs. LATN
« on: May 15, 2015, 07:25:25 AM »
Please compare and contrast the safety, durability, and recovery of LON vs. LATN.

As I comprehend it, a few suspect knee issues from the LON tibia procedure, due to the nail piercing the patella; although, I read elsewhere on this forum that Dr. Paley disregards that as untrue (which I cannot confirm). Regardless, as a means to avoid that, is it safe and regular to undergo bilateral LON femurs? Is LON weight bearing?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2015, 07:47:20 AM by Bohemia »
Logged
Dr. Alex Monegal / Barcelona, Spain / Femurs 8cm / Implanted August 25, 2015 / Removed February 21, 2018

crimsontide

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1162
Re: LON Vs. LATN
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2015, 10:24:57 AM »
its not just paley that says the risk is low, its rozbruch too

I don't know of too many cases of lon with femur
Logged

Medium Drink Of Water

  • Moderator
  • Premier Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3587
Re: LON Vs. LATN
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2015, 06:22:57 PM »
They are almost exactly the same. The only difference is when the nail is put in, which doesn't make much of a difference in safety/durability/recovery.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »