Limb Lengthening Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Proof that torso length / sitting height is not that important  (Read 3376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NewHeights

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 298
Proof that torso length / sitting height is not that important
« on: February 20, 2015, 09:33:46 PM »

So I found this picture of three equal height models with different torso lengths. The second and third both look good to me. The first and third are obviously the most disproportionate, but none look "bad"

This goes to show like I've always said, wingspan is more important. Please also note, that these show extreme differences in torso length

Logged
177CM/176CM morning/evening :( Wingspan 178 CM :( Inseam/Height 47.7% :( BPEL 7.5" :)
Option 1: Inversion and Glucosamine to 177+CM :)
Option 2: CLL to 180 CM :)
"Be the best version of yourself"

KrP1

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
Re: Proof that torso length / sitting height is not that important
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2015, 09:39:26 PM »

torso length is important, the first and the third look very disproportionate
Logged

Shor7Guy

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 129
Re: Proof that torso length / sitting height is not that important
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2015, 11:24:10 PM »

torso length is just as important as wingspan.
Logged

Puertoricanwasp123

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 298
Re: Proof that torso length / sitting height is not that important
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2015, 12:54:52 AM »

These gray statues are a bad example with the pose and stuff but aestheticwise first one looks odd.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up