Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[LittleWhiteMan]

Hey, you all know that I am 5'1" (61 inches), but actually my lower body is 30 inches and my upper body is 31 inches (my upper body is larger than my lower body). So therefore I was wondering what's the ideal ratio of a male? And also what is a visually acceptable range? (let's say I increase my lower body to 35 inches but my upper body is 31).

[GROWtalORdieTRYING1]

the correct ratio is 1.618

from floor to navel: navel to top of head.

someone who is 6"0 tall should have 113cm from floor to navel(belly button): and 70cm from navel to top of head.

[GROWtalORdieTRYING1]

penis should be at the halfway point.

navel should be at the golden ratio. 1.618

[LittleWhiteMan]

Surprinsingly my height ratio is 1.4 lol, my lower part from the navel point is 91 cm and the upper part from it is 65 cm. That means that I should do LL for sure to reach a great level of aestheticity. (By at least 14 cm)

[680]

REMEMBER those are idle proportions not average.
My ratio is 1.4 too, I think that's the case with most people if not all.

[GROWtalORdieTRYING1]

ideal proportions and golden ratio is the average.

that ratio makes up everything in the known universe as an average for each microcosm.

im not going to explain the how or why this is,  or how this figure came to be. you will just have to research it in your own time.

[680]

If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong, According to this... I have to lengthen 11.5cm to have a ratio of 1.618055555555556 (116.5 / 72). I barely look acceptable at 185cm let alone 189.5cm. NO BLOODY CHANCE IN HELL THAT ONE COULD LOOK EVEN REMOTELY PROPORTIONATE AFTER ADDING 11.5CM DIVIDED IN BOTH SEGMENTS! (sorry for caps)
I just don't get where could you get this idiotic idea, Its just a number ϕ

[680]

Take a look at this: http://www.scribd.com/doc/64454845/Solving-the-Vitruvian-Man-Revised
And comparing the universe to the human body. 
Its like an ant thinking that it has something directly to do with the string theory, Not everything revolves around humans.

[GROWtalORdieTRYING1]

nothing has anything to do with humans.

humans are a microcosm of the same principles.

I have already looked up a study with hundreads of people and their ratios and the average was indeed 1.618. people vary and people who are shorter than average usually have shorter legs in relation to overall body size.


a lot of people who measure their height do so incorrectly.

measure your penis height(where the center of the base attaches to the body) with a stiff metal measuring tape. not a loose string. after you do this report it here.

what ever that height is your actual height should be double.

[123]

If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong, According to this... I have to lengthen 11.5cm to have a ratio of 1.618055555555556 (116.5 / 72). I barely look acceptable at 185cm let alone 189.5cm. NO BLOODY CHANCE IN HELL THAT ONE COULD LOOK EVEN REMOTELY PROPORTIONATE AFTER ADDING 11.5CM DIVIDED IN BOTH SEGMENTS! (sorry for caps)
I just don't get where could you get this idiotic idea, Its just a number ϕ

Just ignore this guy. He's crazy.

[680]

Not sure what you mean by penis height, Do you mean the crotch (number 4 on the figure to number 8 )
If that's the case its wrong again, It says 92.5 X 2 = 185